New SFNV Steering Committee member Dr. Ian Roberts on innovation and collaboration in sustainable food systems

New SFNV Steering Committee member Dr. Ian Roberts on innovation and collaboration in sustainable food systems

Givaudan TW Startup Challenge

Collaboration, technology, and ecosystem thinking will be essential to transforming the global food system, according to Dr. Ian Roberts, who recently joined the Swiss Food & Nutrition Valley Steering Committee. Ian brings more than 30 years of international experience across food, processing, innovation, and sustainability, including leadership roles at Bühler, where he helped drive the company’s transformation in innovation and sustainability. Passionate about building scalable solutions through collaboration, he believes Switzerland is uniquely positioned to demonstrate how industry, academia, startups, and technology can work together to accelerate food system change. We recently caught up with him to discuss the power of ecosystems, the role of technology in food innovation, and Switzerland’s opportunity to lead by example.

Ian, welcome to the Valley! What inspired you to join the Swiss Food & Nutrition Valley Steering Committee?

Thank you. I’m delighted to join the Steering Committee of the Swiss Food & Nutrition Valley. I’ve been involved with the Valley for a number of years, and I really believe it has the potential to help us transform towards a more sustainable food system.

And the reason I say this is that, in my 30-plus years working in food, whether with consumer goods companies, in B2B and processing, or with startups, what I have seen is that real change doesn’t come from one single point. You need to build a very strong and profound ecosystem if you want to drive transformation.

Switzerland is very well equipped for this. We have fantastic multinational food companies, strong B2B players, process technology companies, flavour companies, ingredient companies, consumer goods companies, and also some of the best universities and research institutes in the world. When you combine that with informed consumers, you create an ecosystem around food that can truly drive change.

What excites me is the opportunity to help focus this extraordinary ecosystem. To play to the strengths of Switzerland, demonstrate solutions here, and do so in a way that can be replicated in other regions of the world.

You’ve led Bühler’s transformation in innovation and sustainability. What key lessons from that journey can be applied to the broader food system?

One of the key lessons is that innovation and sustainability cannot sit at the side of the business. They have to be embedded into the core of how you think, how you invest, and how you make decisions.

At Bühler, we learned that if you want to drive meaningful change, you need a very clear ambition, but you also need the mechanisms to make it happen. That means building capabilities, building partnerships, and creating the right culture so that people are empowered to work differently.

The other important lesson is that no company can solve these challenges alone. The food system is interconnected. It includes farmers, processors, technology providers, brands, retailers, consumers, regulators, academia, and investors. So the ability to collaborate across boundaries becomes absolutely essential.

And finally, we need to move from talking about sustainability to demonstrating it. We need scalable solutions, we need measurable impact, and we need to show that sustainability and economic viability can go hand in hand.

With your background in engineering and digital transformation, how do you see technology reshaping food production and processing in the coming years?

I think technology will play a very significant role in reshaping food production and processing, but we have to be clear that technology is an enabler, not an end in itself.

Digital technologies, for example, can help us understand processes much more deeply. They can help us reduce waste, improve yield, optimize energy use, and increase food safety. If we can measure better, we can manage better, and that is hugely important in a food system where resources are under pressure.

Engineering also has a major role to play. We need processing technologies that are more efficient, more flexible, and better adapted to new raw materials and new food concepts. Scaling technologies for example sustainable proteins, cost-effective precision fermentation and sidestream upcycling are essential.

I see the future as one where food production becomes more intelligent, more resource-efficient, and more connected. But the key will be to ensure that these technologies are applied to solve real problems and can bring impact at scale.

You’ve been deeply involved in building innovation ecosystems and startup accelerators. What role do startups play in driving food system change?

Startups play an important role because they often bring a different mindset. They challenge assumptions, they move fast, and they are willing to take risks in areas where larger organisations may be more cautious.

In food system transformation, we need that energy. We need new ideas, new business models, new technologies, and new ways of thinking about consumers and value chains. Startups are often very good at identifying specific pain points and creating focused solutions around them.

But we also have to recognise that food is a complex industry. Scaling in food is not easy. You need infrastructure, regulatory understanding, quality systems, market access, and often significant capital. This is where ecosystems become so important.
The real opportunity is to connect startups with established companies, universities, investors, and technology providers in a way that helps them scale faster and more effectively. Startups bring the spark, but the ecosystem can help turn that spark into something that has real impact.

Sustainability is a core focus of your work. What do you see as the most urgent challenges the food system must address today?

There are several urgent challenges, and they are all connected. We need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce food loss and waste, use water and energy more efficiently, protect biodiversity, and at the same time provide nutritious, affordable food to a growing population across the globe.

That is a very complex equation. It is not enough to optimise one part of the system if we create problems somewhere else. It is important to approach this with a systemic perspective.

Food loss and waste, for example, is an area where we can have a very significant impact. If we can make better use of the raw materials we already produce, that is one of the most powerful levers we have. At the same time, we need to look at how we produce and consume proteins, how we improve nutrition, and how we make supply chains more resilient.

The urgency lies in moving from isolated initiatives to systemic transformation. We have many solutions already available, but we need to scale them, connect them, and make them economically viable.

How can industry, academia, and entrepreneurs collaborate more effectively to accelerate scalable solutions?

The first point is that we need a shared ambition. Collaboration works best when different actors are aligned around a clear challenge and a clearly defined desired outcome.

Industry brings market understanding, scale, and operational experience. Academia brings deep knowledge, research capability, and scientific rigor. Entrepreneurs bring speed, creativity, and the willingness to challenge existing models. Each of these is powerful on its own, but the real magic happens when they come together.

Collaboration also needs structure. It is not enough to say we want to collaborate. We need platforms, programmes, and environments where people can work together with trust, transparency, and a focus on impact.

This is where Switzerland has a real opportunity. We have the concentration of players, the quality of institutions, and the entrepreneurial energy to create these connections. The challenge is to focus them on the areas where we can make the greatest difference and then move quickly from ideas to implementation.

Switzerland is known for its strong innovation ecosystem. In your opinion, what sets it apart?

I think Switzerland has a very unique combination of strengths. It has world-class universities and research institutes, a strong industrial base, leading food and technology companies, and a culture of quality and precision.

It is also a country where people are used to working across languages, regions, and disciplines. That may sound simple, but it is actually very valuable when you are trying to build ecosystems. Collaboration is part of the way the country works.

Another strength is that Switzerland is small enough to connect people quite quickly, but influential enough to have global relevance. That means we can test, demonstrate, and scale ideas in a very effective way.

To maintain its leadership, Switzerland needs to continue investing in innovation, but also in openness. We need to remain connected to global challenges and global markets. The opportunity is not only to create solutions for Switzerland, but to demonstrate solutions in Switzerland that can inspire and support transformation elsewhere.

Is there a message you’d like to share with the SFNV community?

My message would be that we have a tremendous opportunity, but also a tremendous responsibility.

The food system touches everything from health, climate, nature, culture, and economy, to society. If we want to transform it, we need to work together in ways that are perhaps deeper and more practical than before.

The Swiss Food & Nutrition Valley can play a very important role in this. It can bring people together, focus on the ecosystem, and help demonstrate what is possible when industry, academia, startups, and public institutions align around a common goal.
I very much look forward to working with the community, with my colleagues on the Steering Committee, and with Christina and the team. I believe Switzerland has the ingredients to drive profound change — and to do so in a way that can be relevant far beyond its borders.

Never miss a Swiss food innovation morsel.

Pasta Premium launches cook-stable pasta without egg white using EggField Aquafaba

Pasta Premium launches cook-stable pasta without egg white using EggField Aquafaba

In collaboration with EggField, Pasta Premium is launching a new generation of cook-stable, plant-based pasta. The products will be introduced under the ERNST brand and combine the firm bite of traditional pasta with a fully plant-based formulation. They have been specifically developed for use in gastronomy, catering, and food service.

The new ERNST pasta is based on durum wheat semolina and aquafaba (legume cooking water), a by-product of legume processing. It replaces key functionalities of egg, enabling pasta with a stable structure and high cooking, holding, and regeneration performance—critical for professional kitchen environments. With this development, Pasta Premium also responds to volatile egg availability while offering a resource-efficient and long-term stable alternative.

“Our legume-based ingredient delivers the functionality of egg—without compromising on sensory quality. The collaboration with Pasta Premium shows that even in pasta applications, sustainable, scalable, and high-performing solutions are possible,” says Silvan Leibacher, CEO and co-founder of EggField. For ERNST pasta, the focus was not only on product quality but also on real-world applicability.

“What mattered most was a solution that works in everyday professional kitchens and is future-proof,” says Sarah Anderhub, Head of Marketing at ERNST pasta. “The new products allow our customers to simplify their assortment, respond flexibly to different dietary needs, and consistently deliver high quality. At the same time, they rely on an innovative Swiss product with a compelling price-performance ratio—both from a quality and economic perspective.”

Traditional egg-based recipes are not being replaced; rather, EggField enables, for the first time, the production of cook-stable pasta without the addition of egg white. For food service operators, this simplifies both offerings and processes: the pasta serves as a single solution across different dietary requirements—from conventional to plant-based. In addition, removing egg as an allergen simplifies labeling, procurement, and storage—without requiring changes in kitchen processes or recipes.

Sign up for quarterly Swiss food innovation updates.

Cosaic secures $6 million seed extension as industry leaders back next-generation food ingredients

Cosaic secures $6 million seed extension as industry leaders back next-generation food ingredients

Cosaic, the Swiss food biotech startup developing yeast-derived multifunctional ingredients, today announced a $6 million round. The round includes participation from dsm-firmenich Ventures, the venture arm of dsm-firmenich, a global leader in Health, Nutrition and Beauty. Also joining the round are a large Swiss family office and Kickfund, a Swiss deeptech investor,  as well as existing investors such as Navus Ventures and Zuercher Kantonalbank. In a tougher funding environment, this round shows that investors continue to support foodtech companies when the technology is distinctive and the commercialization plan is realistic.

Cosaic is developing a new category of food ingredients based on yeast fermentation. Its platform is designed to help food and beverage manufacturers deliver creaminess, stability and functionality in a single ingredient, addressing formulation challenges that have traditionally required multiple components and additives. This investment signals growing industry interest in ingredient platforms that move beyond one-to-one replacement narratives and instead offer measurable functional value to manufacturers.

The round will support three priorities over the coming phase of growth to become market ready: regulatory work, production scale-up, and industrial trials with large clients.

“This round sends a clear signal: the market is backing foodtech companies that can deliver real functional value and a credible path to commercialization,” said Tomas Turner, co-founder and CEO of Cosaic. “At Cosaic, we are building an ingredient that resolves the trade-offs food companies face every day between clean label, sensory performance, and cost. With strong strategic backing and a capital-efficient scale-up model, we are well positioned to move from development to launch readiness.”

The announcement follows Cosaic’s strategic go-to-market partnership with another leading ingredient house, Ingredion, announced in late 2025, which provided the company with important commercial validation. With backing from Ingredion and dsm-firmenich Ventures, Cosaic is now accelerating the path from product development to market launch.

About Cosaic (formerly known as Cultivated Biosciences)

Cosaic is a Swiss biotech and foodtech startup that aims for a world in which good food choices benefit everyone: people, businesses, and the planet. They do this with ingredient solutions that offer greater industry resilience and greater consumer satisfaction. Cosaic Neo is their first ingredient, a unique natural multifunctional emulsion that delivers perfect stability and delicious creaminess, all at once, by itself. It is a patented food ingredient born from yeast fermentation. Its complex microstructure allows for multiple functionalities to reconcile product performance with sensory experience while cleaning labels. Cosaic employs 15 people and is in pre-series A stage, preparing for a market entry next year in the US. More info: www.cosaic.bio

Sign up for quarterly Swiss food innovation updates.

Swiss student innovators took the stage at Ecotrophelia Switzerland 2026

Swiss student innovators took the stage at Ecotrophelia Switzerland 2026

Ecotrophelia Switzerland 2026 brought together some of the country’s most promising student innovators, as multidisciplinary teams from Swiss universities presented sustainable, market-ready food products to an expert jury of industry and academic leaders.

Part of a wider European initiative, the competition challenges students to translate scientific knowledge into commercially viable solutions, combining creativity, technical expertise and entrepreneurial thinking. This year’s edition once again highlighted the strength of Switzerland’s talent pipeline in food innovation.

“Ecotrophelia is a unique platform where students can apply their knowledge to real-world challenges in the food system,” said Sandra Galle, Professor of Food Technology and Biotechnology at HES-SO, School of Engineering in Sion. “It not only fosters innovation, but also helps build the skills and confidence needed to bring new ideas to market.”

This year’s finalists

Three teams were selected to compete in this year’s final, each showcasing a different approach to sustainable food innovation:

  • Team Appy developed an apple juice drink with functional apple pomace pearls.
  • Team Sorgood created a fermented beverage based on sorghum for a more resilient food system.
  • Team TAMs developed a high-fiber  Provençale snack made of low-glycemic index ingredients and by-products.

Sorgood is crowded the national winner

The jury awarded first place to Sorgood, recognising the product’s innovation, sustainability impact, and market potential. 

The winning team stood out with an innovative plant-based beverage made from sorghum, a resilient and underutilised climate-smart crop. Their solution highlights how traditional grains can inspire sustainable, nutritious alternatives in the plant-based beverage category. 

An industry perspective

This year’s national competition was made possible thanks to the generous support of Valley partners Helbling Technik, Nestlé, Bühler Group and Givaudan.

Reflecting on the competition, Lorenz Klauser, Senior Vice President and Partner at Helbling Technik, noted: “Ecotrophelia shows how innovation starts with people. Sharing our experience in bringing products to life and our broad technical expertise with these talented teams has been truly rewarding. It highlights how young talent can drive real change in the food system.”

From the jury’s perspective, Robert Mitchell, Head of Food Science at Bühler, added: “It’s impressive how quickly students developed solid concepts. Competitions like Ecotrophelia help prepare the next generation to tackle real-world challenges in scaling affordable, nutritious food. Congratulations to all the teams.”

At Nestlé R&D, the importance of nurturing entrepreneurial talent was front of mind. As Maria Eugenia Barcos, Nestlé Research Startup Program Lead, put it: “At Nestlé R&D, we believe that supporting young talents with an entrepreneurial spirit is essential to accelerating the transformation of sustainable food systems. It’s been impressive to see how the students naturally take into account the importance of collaboration, sustainability and market readiness.”

Highlighting the role of sensory experience and creativity in food innovation, Matthias Schultz, Research Director at Givaudan International SA, said: “Watching the young talents at Ecotrophelia bring their bold ideas to life was truly inspiring. Their entrepreneurial drive and creativity turned ideas into tangible food experiences , a vision that resonates deeply with Givaudan’s purpose of creating happier, healthier lives with love for nature. ”

What comes next

The journey continues beyond the competition. In the coming months, participating teams will continue to be supported by industry partners, including Nestlé, Helbling Technik, Bühler and Givaudan, helping them further refine their concepts and explore pathways to market.

The winning team will go on to represent Switzerland at Ecotrophelia Europe, one of Europe’s leading student competitions in food innovation, taking place at SIAL Paris later this year.

Find out more about HES-SO’s Bachelor of Life Sciences here.

Sign up for quarterly Swiss food innovation updates.

planetary raises ~$28 million (CHF 22 million) in funding to scale global fermentation infrastructure and licensing platform

planetary raises ~$28 million (CHF 22 million) in funding to scale global fermentation infrastructure and licensing platform

Planetary SA (“planetary” or the “Company”), the Swiss-based full-stack fermentation company building the industrial backbone of the bioeconomy, today announced a ~USD 20 million (CHF 16 million) Series A equity financing round, supplemented by ~USD 7.5m (CHF 6 million) in credit, bringing total funding to approximately ~USD 40 million (CHF 32 million).

The round was led by Radikal Capital and Oetker Ventures, with participation from, amongst others, Royal Cosun (as previously announced), arc investors, Green Generation Fund and AgriFoodTech Venture Alliance, as well as existing investors Astanor Ventures and XAnge. This diverse syndicate (bringing together carbohydrates producers, food corporates, venture capital funds, and family offices) reflects broad confidence in planetary’s full-stack approach and support for its global ingredient commercial rollout and technology licensing strategy.

The strong interest in the round underscores a clear market shift: category leaders controlling the full value chain from process development and industrial infrastructure to product launch are emerging as the winners of the new food revolution.

On the closing this round, David Brandes, CEO and co-founder of planetary added: “Raising capital outside AI and defense now requires far more focus and resilience than it did just a few years ago. Yet, recent geopolitical turmoil and commodity volatility only strengthen the case for a sovereign, circular, and high-quality food system: stay the course and hold the line, nothing worth building comes easy.”

planetary operates a proprietary full-stack platform spanning bioprocess design, scale-up and industrial manufacturing via its WIPO GREEN listed BioBlocks™ system, enabling partners to bring fermentation-based food ingredients to market efficiently.

At the core of its IP-rich strategy sits the global licensing of its technology to agro-industrial players, particularly sugar companies, enabling the conversion of low-value side streams into high-value proteins, fibers and enzymes, unlocking a new circular bioeconomy.

The company has demonstrated strong commercial traction. Following the nationwide launch of its mycoprotein filet with ALDI Suisse at price parity, the company is now rolling out additional launches across Europe under its B2B brand Libre® across alternative meat and dairy, meat hybrid products, fiber-rich products and protein fortification applications.

planetary is also expanding its sugar-to-protein upcycling technology globally, including initiatives to enable ultra-low-cost mycoprotein production below $1/kg through partnerships with agro-industrial players in sucrose-rich and protein-deficient geographies, such as India.

With industrial-scale production already operational in Aarberg, Switzerland and a growing pipeline of licensing partnerships, planetary is positioning itself as a central technology layer for the fermentation economy.

The company welcomes discussions with engineers, commercial leaders and product innovators interested in joining a category-defining company, as well as with customers seeking to co-develop the next-generation food products. planetary will selectively engage with mission-aligned investors interested in participating in a second closing of the round, planned for later this summer.

Sign up for quarterly Swiss food innovation updates.

Healthy eating – can we close the gap between evidence and public belief?

Healthy eating – can we close
the gap between evidence
and public belief?

Executive Director
World Food System Center, ETH Zurich

Jeanne Tomaszewski

Research Coordinator
World Food System Center, ETH Zurich

This is a guest contribution. The views expressed are those of the authors.

The science behind how food, nutrition, and health interact is highly complex. This complexity drives scientific debate but also makes it difficult to translate evidence into simple, actionable guidance for policymakers and consumers. Navigating this intricate landscape, international organizations and national governments work closely with scientists to define what healthy and sustainable diets should look like. The 2025 report by the EAT‑Lancet Commission is a recent example of a broad, global scientific assessment.

However, many people today trust wellness influencers more than science-based recommendations, widening the gap between evidence and public belief. This fuels lively discussions but also uncertainty and frustration.

The ongoing discussion around ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) in particular is a clear example of this disconnect, with science, media, policy and public perception often moving in different directions as evidence continues to evolve. 

Diets evolved within globalized food systems

At a recent event on Planetary Health and Healthy Diets at the Istituto Svizzero in Rome, co-organised by the World Food Systems Center, we explored the bigger picture: 

  • What’s the purpose of our food system? 
  • Who shapes it? 
  • How can we work together to make healthier diets easier for everyone? 

A clear message emerged: the debate is not about blaming people or demonising foods, but about understanding how our diets evolve and how they can be improved. 

For thousands of years, humans have fermented, dried, milled and cooked food to stay safe and reduce waste. In the last decades, processed foods, frozen meals, and canned ingredients were symbols of progress, comfort and convenience. Modern lifestyles and industrial marketing made them feel essential. Processing remains essential for safety, affordability, and functioning global food supply chains. Today, they remain the reality for millions in a globalized world where highly processed options are cheap, available everywhere, and heavily advertised. As a result, fresh fruits and vegetables are increasingly less accessible than processed options. Still, processed foods should not dominate our diet.

The concern is not processing, but ultraprocessing, where food is transformed so much that its structure and function change in ways that may have health implications that are still not fully understood. The NOVA classification helps describe this by grouping foods according to the degree of processing and defining UPFs as industrial formulations with multiple processing steps and additives such as emulsifiers and sweeteners.

Science on healthy diets is complex

Tools like NOVA can help consumers or regulators to identify broad patterns, but they are not the ideal foundation for scientific debate. Research shows a clear trend: people who eat many UPFs face higher risks of various diseases. Yet UPFs differ widely. Sugary drinks, processed meats, and additiverich products show consistent negative effects. Meanwhile, nutrientrich UPFs like tofu, fortified plantbased milks, or wholegrain breads can still offer important nutrients or affordable calories (Chen Z. et al., 2023; Cordova R. et al., 2023; Touvier, M., 2026).

The scientific question is not whether some UPFs can harm health, but why, and how. Many researchers are, for example, examining whether the risks come from ultraprocessing itself or from the typical composition of some UPFs: high sugar, salt, and unhealthy fats and low beneficial nutrients. The microbiome adds another layer of complexity. This vast, constantly shifting community of microbes affects metabolism, nutritional uptake, and health impact. Science is only beginning to understand how it responds to different food items, their degree of processing, structures, additives and contaminants. 

Because of these uncertainties, it is difficult to determine precisely how UPFs influence metabolism, longterm health and the future role of personalized diets. They also show why nutrition science matters: clearer guidance depends on a deeper understanding of how the human body works. This requires more research, not less.

Who should we trust?

Despite the complex links between nutrition, processing and health, some principles are simple. No single meal determines health but consistent patterns do. Regularly eating vegetables, fruits, whole grains and pulses, with processed foods kept occasional, remains one of the strongest and most consistent findings in nutrition science. Reports such as the one on the Planetary Health Diet offer clear, evidencebased guidance while still allowing flexibility for culture, taste and access.

Yet how these messages are received depends strongly on cultural context. Food science research and practice helps develop evidencebased guidance, but this guidance only works if people trust it. Personalities often overshadow facts, and myths can spread faster than evidence. Wellness content on social media frequently circulates long before scientific research is communicated or understood. 

Scientific communication is a delicate balance. If scientists emphasise too much complexity, they risk losing the audience; if they simplify too much or call for transformative or drastic individual behavioural change, they risk being accused of activism. In this environment, good science communication requires storytelling, transparency, and a good understanding of the larger context to support better choices for policy makers and consumers alike.

Who is responsible?

We all should help move diets in a healthier direction. Simple guidance can help: a colourful plate filled with fruits, vegetables and whole foods provides diverse phytonutrients is a practical starting point for eating in ways that support both human and planetary health.

Research on UPFs and their links to health outcomes must continue, but this should not delay action to restore, protect and promote diets based on whole foods. Scientists and research institutions must communicate clearly and honestly. Policy makers must use evidence to shape policies and regulations supporting healthier food environments. Industry and retailers must contribute by reformulating products and offering healthier options at fair prices. And citizens need to understand that science evolves; not because experts are confused, but because evidence deepens over time.

Closing the gap between evidence and public belief will depend not only on better science, but on building trust in how that science is shared, understood, and applied.

Hungry for more food for thought?